Delhi High Court on 17th December 2025 held that 1-year separation under S.13B(1) can be waived and 6-month cooling-off under S.13B(2) may also be waived in exceptional cases.
In a significant decision, a 3-Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court (Justices Navin Chawla, Anup Jairam Bhambhani and Renu Bhatnagar) decided important questions on whether spouses can file and obtain divorce by mutual consent even before completing 1 year of their marriage or one year of separation, and how the 6-month cooling-off period can be handled.
This judgment is extremely helpful for couples who are mutually agreed to separate, but are stuck due to statutory timelines.
Court: High Court of Delhi
Case: Shiksha Kumari v. Santosh Kumar
Citation/Number: MAT.APP.(F.C.) 111/2025
Judgment Delivered: 17.12.2025
Core Issue: Can the court waive the one-year separation requirement under Section 13B(1) HMA and the six-month waiting period under Section 13B(2) HMA?
The court answered two questions referred to it:
(a) Whether a petition under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act can be filed by the parties before completing the period of separation of one year?;
(b) If the answer to the above question is in the affirmative, whether the period of six months between the presentation of the First Motion under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act and the Second Motion under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, can be waived off by the learned Court even though the parties have not been living separately for more than one year on the date when such waiver is prayed for?
What the Delhi High Court Held (Simple Explanation)
The Court concluded that the statutory period of one year under Section 13B(1) can be waived by applying the proviso to Section 14(1) HMA.
Many couples are separated (emotionally and practically) but are unable to wait for completion of the one-year separation requirement. This judgment recognizes that in appropriate cases, courts can give relief sooner.
The Court clarified that waiving one year under Section 13B(1) does not prevent the court from also waiving the six-month cooling-off period under Section 13B(2). The two waivers are independent and must be considered separately.
A very important conclusion: if the court is satisfied that both timelines deserve waiver, the court is not legally requiredto postpone the divorce decree’s effective date. The decree may be made effective forthwith.
This is particularly relevant for couples who need early closure for:
safety and dignity,
relocation / job / immigration,
remarriage planning,
avoiding long and purposeless litigation.
The Court cautioned that waiver is not to be granted “for the asking.” It can be granted only if the court is satisfied that there is:
exceptional hardship to the petitioner, and/or
exceptional depravity on the part of the respondent,
and the case must also be tested on the factors laid down in Pooja Gupta.
The Court clarified that waiver can be granted by both:
the Family Court, and
the High Court.
The Court also held that if the waiver was obtained by misrepresentation or concealment, the court may:
defer the date when divorce takes effect, or
dismiss the petition (without prejudice to file again after one year).
This judgment can be especially useful if:
the marriage has effectively broken down soon after marriage;
cohabitation never truly started or lasted only briefly;
parties are mutually settled on alimony/stridhan/custody;
prolonged waiting will only cause emotional, professional, or social harm;
parties want to avoid unnecessary litigation and move on peacefully.
(Every case depends on facts; courts decide waiver on a case-to-case basis.)
At Pankaj Kumar & Co., we assist clients in:
drafting and filing Mutual Consent Divorce (First Motion & Second Motion),
preparing a strong waiver application (where applicable),
ensuring settlement terms cover alimony/maintenance, custody, visitation, stridhan/articles, withdrawal of cases, etc.,
representation before Family Courts in Delhi and in appropriate matters before the Delhi High Court.
In appropriate cases, courts may waive the one-year requirement under Section 13B(1) by applying the proviso to Section 14(1), as clarified in this Delhi High Court judgment.
Yes, the Court clarified that waiver of one year does not preclude waiver of six months; both are independent considerations.
Not necessarily. If the court is satisfied that waiver is justified, the decree may be effective immediately.
No. Waiver is not automatic and requires satisfaction of “exceptional hardship”/“exceptional depravity” and other factors (such as those in Pooja Gupta).
Both Family Court and High Court can grant waiver depending on the facts and stage of proceedings.
If you are planning Mutual Consent Divorce and want to understand:
whether early filing is possible in your case,
whether a waiver application can be moved, and
how to structure a strong settlement,
you may contact Pankaj Kumar & Co. for consultation and representation.